Excellent video on mass extinction including the White race

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHjbEkI8HE4&feature=related

New York Times urges white women to stop reproducing, for the sake of the environment

The impact of children varies dramatically depending on geography: An American woman who has a baby will generate nearly seven times the carbon footprint of that of a Chinese woman who has a child, the study found.

The calculations take account of the fact that each child is, in turn, likely to have more children. And because the calculations derive from the fertility rate — the expected number of children per woman in various countries — the findings focus on women, although clearly men participate in the decision to have children.

“In discussions about climate change, we tend to focus on the carbon emissions of an individual over his or her lifetime,” said Paul Murtaugh, a professor of statistics at O.S.U., in a statement accompanying the study’s release. “Those are important issues and it’s essential that they should be considered. But an added challenge facing us is continuing population growth and increasing global consumption of resources.”

LINK -

The Chinese woman will have just as much of an ecological  impact as the average western woman if she is one of the more wealthy Chinese, or if she actually lives in the west – and in any case there are a several Chinese for every one westerner.  What is happening in the west is that while whites have half the number of children needed to replace our numbers, our lands are being more than topped up with non-westerners immigrating here, and our excess taxes, instead of being used on our children, are used to help facilitate the proliferation of many times more non-whites in the “developing world” and to give these people the means to destroy the ecology ever more thoroughly.   In fact, when all these factors are taken into account, whites having children is considerably LESS damaging than when whites are childless.  The NYT is spouting vicious racist anti-white propaganda aimed at enriching multinational corporations.

Men have become immature and are suppressing women from having children

One correspondent told me the poignant story of how she very much wanted to have children but had trouble finding a man willing to accept the responsibility. “Why is it never mentioned that men are also culpable?” she asked. She has friends who also have been stiffed by partners who had no interest in fatherhood because children interfere with a man’s “play time.”

The declining birthrate in Canada stems from the fact that young people — men and women — are taking longer to grow up and assume adult roles, like parenthood. But it seems that today’s men take particularly long to grow up.

Consider a 30-year-old woman who is starting to hear the first ticks of her biological clock. She looks around and what does she see? That the men around her, who have no clock to worry about, are still staying up till 2 a.m. watching the sports channel, drinking Mike’s Hard Lemonade and trying out a new girlfriend every month, no different from when they were 20.

LINK -

If there is really such a shortage of sensible men, the women must embrace single parenthood and the stigma of having children by various men should be abandoned.  Such women may deserve medals instead.

Beautiful women have the most children

FOR the female half of the population, it may bring a satisfied smile. Scientists have found that evolution is driving women to become ever more beautiful, while men remain as aesthetically unappealing as their caveman ancestors.

The researchers have found beautiful women have more children than their plainer counterparts and that a higher proportion of those children are female. Those daughters, once adult, also tend to be attractive and so repeat the pattern.

Over generations, the scientists argue, this has led to women becoming steadily more aesthetically pleasing, a “beauty race” that is still on. The findings have emerged from a series of studies of physical attractiveness and its links to reproductive success in humans.

LINK -

That is good to know.  So remember ladies, if you are not having babies then maybe its because you are ugly!

Shanghai couples urged to have second child as Chinese population ages

Family planning officers and volunteers will make home visits and slip leaflets under doorways to encourage couples to have a second child if both of them grew up as only children. Emotional and financial counselling will also be provided.

“Shanghai’s over-60 population already exceeds 3 million, or 21.6% of registered residents,” he told Reuters. “That is already near the average figure of developed countries and is still rising quickly.”

China started a family planning programme in the 1970s and began implementing the one-child-per-couple policy in 1979, aimed at curbing growth in the world’s most populous nation. But success in curbing population growth has created its own headaches. The country will have just 1.6 working-age adults to support every person aged 60 and above, compared with 7.7 in 1975. A report by the US department of health and human services last month said the success of birth control measures means the growth of China’s labour force may soon cease. In less than 10 years the size of the labour force is likely to start declining so that one of China’s economic advantages may disappear.

LINK -

The white race faces the same problem.  Our population is (more than) topped up with non-white immigrants while the Chinese have resisted a similar ethnocidal policy – no doubt assuming that their own population will increase according to the dictates of government.   In Europe the young people supporting the (majority white) old people will be majority non-white at some point.  ”Supporting”?  Hmmm.   Basically things are not going to be that sweet.

Chinese birth rate: 13.71 births/1,000 population  -  (multiracial)  British birth rate:   10.65 births/1,000 population

The Chinese population is still growing by millions a year.

“We who dominate the world economy may become irrelevant”

If current trends continue, the United Arab Emirates, for example, will double its population in just 15 years. And places as diverse as Sierra Leone, Eritrea, Afghanistan and Kuwait aren’t far behind.

What this means for us — aside from the developed countries’ unique problem of who’ll do all the work and pay the taxes when the baby boomers are put out to pasture — is, broadly speaking, one of two scenarios. If the many countries that are struggling today do manage to succeed, we who now dominate the world economy will become increasingly irrelevant. And that’s the best outcome we can hope for. Because if the others don’t do well, if so many remain so poor, we can expect to be increasingly resented and even violently targeted.

Worse, if the world does grow into an uglier place, the West’s ability to protect its interests and to impose order — to put boots on the ground in order to contain regional conflicts, for example — can be expected to diminish at least as fast as our economic clout. Today our failure to do anything effective to stop the horror in places like the Congo and Darfur is mainly due to lack of will; tomorrow it’s likely that we’ll lack the means.

LINK -

Here we can see that even the mainstream media is taking an increasingly panicked and doom-laden view of the future. AND THEY ARE RIGHT TO DO SO!

Small families = sad neurotic individuals at risk of loneliness and rejection

Ostracism is more powerful now than ever because people have fewer strong family and friend support systems to fall back on when faced with exclusion in relationships, the workplace or even Internet chat rooms, says a Purdue University social psychologist. “The effects of ostracism are a health concern,” says Kipling Williams, professor of psychological sciences who researches ostracism. “Excluding and ignoring people, such as giving them the cold shoulder or silent treatment, are used to punish or manipulate, and people may not realize the emotional or physical harm that is being done. Some purposely hurt others by not inviting them to a party or ignoring them at work, and others may not even realize they are ostracizing someone when they ignore a new temporary employee or a friend after a disagreement.

“In the past, people who were ostracized at work or by a friend could seek support and control through another significant relationship. But because people report growing more distant from extended family and relying on fewer close friendships, they might lack the support to deal with ostracism.”

LINK -

Interesting how the point is made that this ostracism has far less, if any, effect on people from large families (unless of course it would be the family itself that excluded them). When parents only have one or two children [ especially when a whole race does this on average ] they never think how cruel they are being to their kids making them so much more dependent upon non-family members/peer group for social approval. And of course this has an impact on society creating people concerned to “fit in” with a crowd that often doesn’t have any benevolent intentions towards them, rather than having a close-knit tribe that they can be confident of being accepted in.

British home secretary refuses a cap on immigration

Home Secretary Alan Johnson last night refused point blank to cap the number of immigrants coming to Britain.

And he said he does not ‘lie awake at night’ worrying about the population hitting 70million.

Official figures show at the current rate of increase the British population will hit the milestone within 20 years, with a further seven million immigrants placing a burden on public services.

Immigration Minister Phil Woolas has pledged that the Government will not allow the population to grow to that level. But last night he was apparently undermined by his boss.

LINK -

This is sickening.  It has been proved that immigrants do NOT help the British economy since they are a burden to the welfare state and commit more crime per head than the indigenous population.  They work on the black market much of the time and much of the money they make is sent to relatives abroad.  They drive down wages and working conditions for the indigenous population and benefit individual capitalists  - who no doubt bribed the govenment to make this decision.  The intention to keep flooding this overcrowded land with these people is nothing short of genocide.  Additionally, it destroys the natural environment – not only because of the increasing built up areas but the added pollution.  The British people must vote for a party that cares about the land and people before it is too late.

Maltese CNI leader comments on the low European birth rate

“The EU is encouraging immigration to make up for its shrinking population, and yet it is also spending large amounts of money promoting the use of contraceptives, therefore reducing its own birth rate,” Dr Mifsud Bonnici said at a press conference. This, he said, was a paradox, and Europe should instead have incentives to boost the European birth rate.

LINK -

Can you imagine our society ceasing to promote contraception?  The white race is in love with contraception.  Most could not imagine life without it.

Proposals on how to reduce India’s population include encouraging TV watching

While addressing a World Population Day celebration in New Delhi, Union health minister, Ghulam Nabi Azad, suggested that providing electricity to villages for late night television shows can reduce population of India . The joke provoked laughter.

“If there is electricity in every village, people will watch TV till late night and then fall asleep. They won’t get a chance to produce children. When there is no electricity, there is nothing else to do but produce babies,” he said.

The serious suggestions for population control from Azad were as follows.

• Delayed marriage till the age of 30-31 years
• Suitable time gap between two children

Azad holds that coercion was not acceptable for promoting family planning amd favours the universal acceptance of small family norms.

LINK

————

Notice how Azad could pass for a European in his looks?

Of course this idea that television would control the birth rate is now proven to be true.  The Brazilians admit that their soap operas have caused a massive drop in their birth and marriage rate – and other countries probably just don’t want to spell it out – especially those that still have white majorities.  Whites may be especially prone to the insidious effects of TV propaganda through example.  This could be explained by the lack of community spirit amongst whites, and lack of ethnic identity – making us more vulnerable than an Asian Muslim watching East Enders, etc.