Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Media Articles about the Demographic Time Bomb’ Category

More white Americans are dying than being born for the first time in modern history—suggesting minorities and newcomers will play an important role in fueling the population growth America’s recovering economy needs to thrive.

LINK

This news is especially alarming considering that people have an increasing life expectancy.  In other words, had the life expectancy stayed at 65 rather than 75 there would have been considerably more dying than being born many years ago rather than the statistic being delayed until now.

Read Full Post »

Nearly half the families in the country have just one child, according to an official analysis.

It found the number of one-child families has increased by almost 700,000 in 15 years, and they are likely to be in the majority within a decade.

The Office for National Statistics said larger families are under pressure because of ‘the greater challenge of combining work with childcare with three or more children compared with one or two’.

Those who wish to have more children simply go ahead and put that project ahead of financial concerns.  Those who do not do this have no genetic future.

Read Full Post »

SHOULD Scotland’s rapidly growing number of one-person households be seen as a sign of freedom or an erosion of society?

The latest analysis of the 2011 Census data uncovered an extraordinary rise in numbers living by themselves. In 1961 they accounted for just 14% of households. Today that figure is 35%, the largest single category of household type. It is the first time ever that people living alone make up more than a third of Scottish households. These solo households tend to be concentrated in Scotland’s cities, especially Glasgow where they account for 43% of households, making up more than one in five of the city’s population.

LINK

This article tries to put a positive spin on single person households.  Clearly this arrangement is worse than “an erosion of society”, but a clear example of complete collapse.  It is indicative of the death of a nation.

Read Full Post »

Even a few ticks upward in Hispanic turnout have major benefits for the Democratic Party, which stands to draw less than half its support from non-Hispanic white voters by the end of the decade. Meanwhile, the Republicans don’t have a tremendous amount of ground left to gain among white voters, who will shrink both in total numbers and as a share of the electorate in the coming elections.

Predictions are easy to mock. In recent elections, however, partisanship by racial and ethnic background has remained highly predictable in the face of countless calamities. The demographics of the electorate are going to change so rapidly in the next eight years that politics will seem unrecognizable, but these party loyalties may very well be intact. This fact is not difficult to recognize whatsoever.

LINK

There is a general apathy about this situation yet it is one aspect of the collapse of civilisation.  The Republican Party is repulsive in its obsession with money rather than folk – but that is the very reason it is reflecting a folk extinction.

People who have a racially loyal view on life are unlikely to support a party that is so inhuman and this observation applies to Whites who are racially aware too.  But what party is there in the US for such Whites to see as offering them hope for the future?

Read Full Post »

What do you do when your country is dying, one coffin at a time? Well, if you are Russian President Vladimir Putin, you call upon Russian couples to be fruitful and multiply, and have at least three children.

It is hard to exaggerate the demographic straits that Mother Russia finds itself in. According to the projections of the UN Population Division–we are speaking here of the so-called “low variant,” historically the most accurate–the Russian population will shrink by more than 30 million by mid-century if current trends continue. The population will age rapidly, from an average age of 37.9 in 2010 to and average age of 49 by 2050. In other words, most Russians will be beyond their childbearing years, and Russia’s demographic fate will be sealed.

The economy will follow the population into the tank. No economy can thrive when a population is moribund, filling more coffins than cradles.

LINK

I don’t really need to add anything to that assessment!

Read Full Post »

A Chinese government thinktank is urging the country’s leaders to start phasing out its one-child policy immediately and allow two children for every family by 2015, a daring proposal to do away with the unpopular policy.

Some demographers view the timeline put forward by the China Development Research Foundation as a bold move by a body close to the central leadership. Others warn that the gradual approach, if implemented, would still be insufficient to help correct the problems that China’s strict birth limits have created.

Link

Effectively there is a one child policy for the indigenous White Europeans.  This is by choice, because most people are too decadent to have enough White babies.  In the UK though our government wants to reduce that average further by taking child benefit away to penalise anyone having more than 3 children.  This way the larger families that bring the average up to one White child per woman will be less likely to achieve that.

Meanwhile the Chinese have consistently, even with their restrictive law, produced more than one Chinese child per Chinese woman.  At present it is at 1.6

Read Full Post »

Critics of my Sunday column on America’s sagging birthrate fell into two camps. The first group denied that sub-replacement fertility is a socioeconomic problem at all, which is an argument that I may try to take up a later date. (For now, Megan McArdle’s extended post on the subject deserves your attention.) The second group agreed with Matt Yglesias, who praised my focus on the levers that policymakers could use to make life easier for would-be parents while rolling his eyes at my concluding paragraph’s suggestion that cultural decadence as well as economic incentives might have something to do with why so many rich societies aren’t reproducing themselves.

if we have moral obligations to future, as-yet-unborn generations, as almost everyone seems to agree, surely those duties have to include some obligation for somebody to bring those generations into existence in the first place — to imitate the sacrifices that our parents made, and give another generation the chances that we’ve had? And if that basic obligation exists in some form, then surely there comes a point when a culture in which it’s crowded out by other goals, other pursuits and yes, other pleasures can be aptly described as … what’s the word I’m looking for … decadent?

Link

It is so refreshing to see these points made in the mainstream media!

Read Full Post »

Only 45 per cent of London’s population were white people of English, Scottish or Welsh heritage, according to the latest data, down from almost 60 per cent in 2001.

This makes London the first UK region where white ethnic Britons have become a minority.

Link

Many people have argued for years that it could never come to this.  They will have to think again. Clearly the projection is that Whites will continue to shrink as a population in every country formerly called a “White” county – but no longer appropriate to call it that.  The low birth rate itself guarantees it.  And civilisation is set to collapse in a few decades more or less.

Read Full Post »

The UK has just been upgraded from ‘multi-cultural’ nation to ‘mostly immigrant’, according to the latest Census. The overseas-born population has increased by 2.9 million over the decade to 2011.

Link“Mostly immigrant”?  That is interesting if that is some sort of official category.   Probably because the demographic trends are seen as a certainty to lead to a majority immigrant country.   Quite possibly there are more immigrants coming in and reproducing than the number of indigenous Brits being born?

[Many other news sites and newspapers have carried the headline I use in this post – but I can’t verify if the site I have quoted from gets this “mostly immigrant” status from any reputable source. ]

Read Full Post »

LONDON: The number of children who count English as their mother tongue are now in the minority at more than 1,600 schools across England. Punjabi is the most frequently spoken language among pupils who do not have English as a first language.

Official figures released by the Department of Education show that close to one million children who now attend schools in England do not have English as their first language at home.

The amount of schools with a majority of pupils who do not class English at their home language is steadily increasing by one a week.

LINK

The only lasting solution to this shocking problem – as we can call it still although soon things could be made worse by such attitudes being made illegal – is for our own people to start having families, especially big families.  Anyone who does not do this is part of our extinction.  Simply putting it off, and suggesting that some kind of civil war can put things straight is madness.  Even after such a ridiculous war, with more of our finest killed, we still would disappear without replacing our numbers.  We half each generation at the present rate.

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »